MaltbyNow!
A place to share information about what is happening in Maltby now and our desires for the future.

Waste Management Permit Comments

Written Comments on Permit 08-106048-CP

Topic: Construction of five industrial use buildings on previously approved site.

Comments:

According to Waste Management, they propose to place on the former Calvert Industries site administrative offices, a truck depot/maintenance facility, and a greenwaste reload facility.

The permit request listed a potential impact to existing county roads. I ask you to consider this area very carefully. The Maltby area, with its recent zoning change from Rural Industrial to Urban Industrial, has seen a surge in industrial use. The number of large commercial vehicles using the existing county roads has rapidly increased. Just North on Broadway from the Waste Management site is a new warehouse facility that will continue to increase the number of large commercial vehicles on the road. Just West, Ralph’s cement pumper trucks, numerous dump trucks, and many yard maintenance trucks have arrived.

While Waste Management has not confirmed the number of large commercial vehicles that will be housed at the depot or needed to service the greenwaste reload facility, one can assume it is not trivial. Congestion trying to access State Highway 522 at peak commuter times is already quite intense. The intersection of Yew/W Bostian Rd and 524 is confused and, frankly, dangerous without the added increase expected in the Waste Management request. The State’s plans for building an interchange between 524 and 522 that may aid this situation appear to be on hold.

At a minimum, the County must widen the road in that area to provide turning lanes for all the commercial vehicles that plan to use that short stretch of Broadway. I also ask that the County get clearer plans from Waste Management on the number and type of vehicles they plan to put on the road. It is my opinion that the current county roads are not well designed for the type of traffic that the current zoning allows and must be upgraded for the planned growth to continue.

Regards

Earl


Posted Jul 15 2008, 02:20 PM by Earl

Comments

Earl wrote re: Waste Management Permit Comments
on 07-15-2008 2:46 PM

A reply from the County planner

_______________________________

Earl,

Thank you for your comments regarding the redevelopment of the Calvert industrial site.  A 1st Review of the application and submittal documents is scheduled for completion in early August.  We will be including citizen comments as well as technical comments in our review completion package requesting additional information.

Scott R. Whitcutt

Senior Planner

M/S #604

3000 Rockefeller Ave. Everett, WA  98201-4046

(425) 388-3311 ext. 2680

Peter S wrote re: Waste Management Permit Comments
on 07-15-2008 6:46 PM

I heard similar back from Scott Whitcutt today.  He indicated there were no plans for a transfer station, but I have since heard different from both your site and another individual that Waste Management has bigger plans...

Earl wrote re: Waste Management Permit Comments
on 07-15-2008 9:55 PM

Peter,

Thanks for the info. That is the primary purpose of this site--to share information that we have. I wonder what the County has planned for Maltby.

Bill Jaques wrote re: Waste Management Permit Comments
on 07-15-2008 10:39 PM

Waste Management Development Ref: 08-106048

Hello Neighbors,

I’m afraid that this Waste Management development is just the tip of the iceburg.  The situation is much worse.  I attended a meeting at the Maltby Community Club in June about rural development but a majority of the people wanted to talk about the ugly and hazardous use of land in the Maltby area.  Some people may not know that the Maltby area is an Urban Growth Area (the only UGA in Snohomish County that is not in a city) and it extends west to 86th Ave.  There is no buffer between this area and our rural zoned neighborhoods.  There are ugly, hazardous warehouses backing right up to half million dollar homes AND the County wants to expand this UGA.  We are the only ones that can stop it and we must do it now.  The only way to stop this ugly development is politically because the “light” industry allowed by code lets people like Waste Management move in with little fanfare and NO notice to the community.  This change in land use threatens the community with noise pollution, air pollution, ground pollution, ground water pollution, traffic congestion, pest infestation, and large truck traffic on rural streets where families (including small children) walk, ride bicycles, and play.  Such a development will destroy this quiet community and decimate property values where they have already been drastically reduced by this poor economy.  Waste Management is right next to the railroad so I imagine they will dump their garbage on site and then load it onto rail cars to be hauled off to eastern WA.  They claim this won't happen, but just wait.  Once they are established all sorts of "garbage" will happen.  

I urge you to write to the county planner responsible for this project scott.whitcutt@co.snohomish.wa.us  and voice your opposition to project 08-106048.  We already have ugly and hazardous heavy equipment operations, cement truck operations, mega warehouses, and gravel truck operations that slipped through the crack without much notice.  This area could is a pristine rural area but instead is turning into a “garbage” dump (literally) of ugly industry.  Your letters and emails are the ONLY thing that will change this because your voice also means your vote for the Snohomish County Council.  If you don’t have much time, just send a quick email and tell them that you oppose the project.  We only have until Wed (July 16) to send our input.  See how they try to slip this stuff past us?!?  I have written a letter requesting an extension to the deadline and hearings on this subject, but you know the government.

Your neighbors,

Bill & Shari Jaques

Highland Vista

Peter S wrote re: Waste Management Permit Comments
on 07-16-2008 5:16 PM

I got this from a Maltby resident who has been communicating with Waste Management.  Waste Management is working to setup a community meeting.  The text below is copied from an email direct from a Waste Management employee:

I contacted a meeting facilitator yesterday and am waiting to hear what her schedule is for the next 2 months.  I am working towards a meeting in August or September.

Also, I am with the engineers today, and they are preparing an artists rendering of the facility.  We should have a new sign up in the next couple of weeks with a picture of some sort.

I will let you know as soon as I have more information.

Bill Jaques wrote re: Waste Management Permit Comments
on 07-31-2008 2:50 AM

Waste Management Development Ref: 08-106048

Hello Again Neighbors,

Just a quick update to my previous comments.   Scott said that the deadline for letter submittal does not apply to residents, just businesses around the site.  So you can write a letter of disapproval anytime (they said the first review is in early August).   Honestly, I think that we should have an attorney and I suggest the law firm that successfully defeated the motocross (motor cycle) track at the gravel pit site.  They are environmental specialists.  I have a phone call into Mr Bricklin and hope to hear back tomorrow.  Does anyone know who led the fight against the motocross site?  I am in need of some contacts.  There are hundreds of involved people that could contribute to the cause.  

Regards, Bill

Earl wrote re: Waste Management Permit Comments
on 07-31-2008 8:04 AM

Bill,

I was given an hotmail email address for the organizer for the motocross effort but he/she has never returned my emails so I don't know if the account is being checked.

One thing to consider is what is our next best alternative to Waste Management at that site? I think that we have lost the Urban Industrial zoning fight. (We can keep it from expanding). My question is, what "Urban Industrial" would be better at the Calvert site? From what I hear from longer term neighbors, WM would be much better neighbor than Calvert was.

It is going to be somebody? What kind of thing do we want?

Bill Jaques wrote re: Waste Management Permit Comments
on 08-07-2008 3:41 AM

Earl,

Just abourt anything would be better than Waste Management.  Once they are established, they will surely expand to a transfer station and they have the county in their pocket.  There are many clean businesses that would be better neighbors.  I have talked with the law firm that defeated the motocross site and they are willing to represent us.  They also gave me the name of the gentleman who organized that fight.   I think we need to get organized and I need emails of interested parties.  If people are not interested in getting organized and contributing to a legal fund, then they have made their bed.  If interested, please contact me at wjj98296@aol.com

Powered by Community Server (Non-Commercial Edition), by Telligent Systems